-
Sean Callanan authoredviewing of the final IR. This is useful for confirming that structure layout was correct. I've added two tests: - A test that checks that structs in top-level code are completed correctly during struct layout (they are) - A test that checks that structs defined in function bodies are cpmpleted correctly during struct layout (currently they are not, so this is XFAIL). The second test fails because LookupSameContext() (ExternalASTMerger.cpp) can't find the struct. This is an issue I intend to resolve separately. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36429 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@310318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sean Callanan authoredviewing of the final IR. This is useful for confirming that structure layout was correct. I've added two tests: - A test that checks that structs in top-level code are completed correctly during struct layout (they are) - A test that checks that structs defined in function bodies are cpmpleted correctly during struct layout (currently they are not, so this is XFAIL). The second test fails because LookupSameContext() (ExternalASTMerger.cpp) can't find the struct. This is an issue I intend to resolve separately. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36429 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@310318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Code owners
Assign users and groups as approvers for specific file changes. Learn more.
test.cpp 218 B
// RUN: clang-import-test -dump-ir -import %S/Inputs/Callee.cpp -expression %s | FileCheck %s
// XFAIL: *
// CHECK: %struct.S = type { i
// CHECK: %struct.S.0 = type { i1 }
void foo() {
return Bar().bar(3, true);
}