-
Roman Lebedev authored
The first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it. Summary: Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`), and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the `std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565 Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@315875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Roman Lebedev authoredThe first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it. Summary: Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`), and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the `std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565 Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@315875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Code owners
Assign users and groups as approvers for specific file changes. Learn more.