Make the ?: precedence warning handle pointers to the left of ?

Previously, Clang would fail to warn on:

  int n = x + foo ? 1 : 2;

when foo is a pointer.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@226870 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp

@@ -6129,6 +6129,8 @@ static bool ExprLooksBoolean(Expr *E) {
     return IsLogicOp(OP->getOpcode());
   if (UnaryOperator *OP = dyn_cast<UnaryOperator>(E))
     return OP->getOpcode() == UO_LNot;
+  if (E->getType()->isPointerType())
+    return true;
   return false;
 }

test/Sema/parentheses.c

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void bitwise_rel(unsigned i) {
 
 _Bool someConditionFunc();
 
-void conditional_op(int x, int y, _Bool b) {
+void conditional_op(int x, int y, _Bool b, void* p) {
   (void)(x + someConditionFunc() ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} \
                                            // expected-note {{place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning}} \
                                            // expected-note {{place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first}}
@@ -116,6 +116,14 @@ void conditional_op(int x, int y, _Bool b) {
   // CHECK: fix-it:"{{.*}}":{[[@LINE-6]]:24-[[@LINE-6]]:24}:")"
 
   (void)(x % 2 ? 1 : 2); // no warning
+
+  (void)(x + p ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} expected-note 2{{place parentheses}}
+  (void)(p + x ? 1 : 2); // no warning
+
+  (void)(p + b ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} expected-note 2{{place parentheses}}
+
+  (void)(x + y > 0 ? 1 : 2); // no warning
+  (void)(x + (y > 0) ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} expected-note 2{{place parentheses}}
 }
 
 // RUN: not %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wparentheses -Werror -fdiagnostics-show-option %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-FLAG