Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 8485ca8c authored by Pierre Gousseau's avatar Pierre Gousseau
Browse files

The test added in r275267 does not work on read-only checkouts because of the use of touch -m -t.

Following Tom Rybka suggestion, the test files are now copied to a temporary directory first.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@275415 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
parent 6a795889
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
// Test that the timestamp is not included in the produced pch file with
// -fno-pch-timestamp.
// Copying files allow for read-only checkouts to run this test.
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/pragma-once2-pch.h %T
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/pragma-once2.h %T
// RUN: cp %s %t1.cpp
// Check timestamp is included by default.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++-header -emit-pch -o %t %S/Inputs/pragma-once2-pch.h
// RUN: touch -m -a -t 201008011501 %S/Inputs/pragma-once2.h
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -include-pch %t %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-TIMESTAMP %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++-header -emit-pch -o %t %T/pragma-once2-pch.h
// RUN: touch -m -a -t 201008011501 %T/pragma-once2.h
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -include-pch %t %t1.cpp 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-TIMESTAMP %s
// Check bitcode output as well.
// RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-BITCODE-TIMESTAMP-ON %s
// Check timestamp inclusion is disabled by -fno-pch-timestamp.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++-header -emit-pch -o %t %S/Inputs/pragma-once2-pch.h -fno-pch-timestamp
// RUN: touch -m -a -t 201008011502 %S/Inputs/pragma-once2.h
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -include-pch %t %s 2>&1
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++-header -emit-pch -o %t %T/pragma-once2-pch.h -fno-pch-timestamp
// RUN: touch -m -a -t 201008011502 %T/pragma-once2.h
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -include-pch %t %t1.cpp 2>&1
// Check bitcode output as well.
// RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-BITCODE-TIMESTAMP-OFF %s
#include "Inputs/pragma-once2.h"
#include "pragma-once2.h"
void g() { f(); }
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment